Thursday, September 22, 2011

The Word You're Looking for is 'Looking'


Would it be possible to miss some guy you just met twice for less than two hours? His lingering out of proportion silhouette your memory managed to contrive out of fragile bits of moments of careful awkward glimpses and basic mundane yet exaggerated demographic information about his age, his education, his work (his money); blatantly hovering like an unfinished conversation you don’t know how it got started in the first place or now to end with.
Then the answer is a definite yes, if you are that girl working out a way to move on from her bitterest close thing to a relationship a year ago that it propelled her into any attempt to find another fixation which included getting her ass in for the first (and hopefully the last) time to an overpriced speed dating program for the lonely lovebirds lost in this decadent jungle, they came up with the most satiric and municipal name called Urban Attraction, you felt like you are in a government sponsored programme in Singapore for ensuring the population growth and potentially rejuvenating its future market.
In the battle for finding the right one, the gentlemen were expected to shift from table to table after 3 minutes of getting to know the missus of each post. A dragging repetition of three little minutes of instant concoction and distortion of a personality, a quarter of century worth of life resume and delivered it in such a tiring rapport, you became quite uncomfortably professional in introducing yourself partially. But you never quite grasp the knowledge either your personality could surpass your modest post war look from recent small pox attack with cleavage of sporadic sad spots well-hidden under elaborate shawl; or barely outwit the rest of your Paris Hilton-esque chic and casually glamorous opponents (that is how they interpreted the casual dress code on the invitation) which consisted mostly socialite ladies in blooming and your high school girlfriends that seemed to stay singles just like you when you last saw them almost a decade ago. Then you had to have that self-deprecating comedic routine again of how you end up here which besetting your initial behaviour against being single is like being a leper, even though no one asked you to explain and actually after listening to their brief life stories, these girls were beyond your league and in total bewilderment on how they needed to go speed dating to get a guy.
And of course, there were those man targets to conquer. Those supposed alphas of our dreams. Such a subconscious carnal ambition blundered bluntly into tepid expectation as the mind numbing conversation and rapid rating analysis distracted us from actually talking with each other. Instead, we were busy shooting two-ways monologue of intermittent ideas of who we think we were to avoid formidable silence and uneasiness from dropping on us like bombs. And nobody told you to practice on your poor pictorial memory before meeting ten different guys that looked the same after thirty minutes. So you came handy to develop particular monikers based on what they do that you self-sabotagingly mentioned it out loud to their very ears and to see them cringed just because you thought it was so damn funny, you forgot and kept jumbling their names.
You had your lukewarm not-going-anywhere with banking guy which was too cute to be true, plastic guy or better known as the guy who ditched you for the hotter hostess, car seat guy who emphasized that he was in distributing, not manufacturing and he was quite jolly and carefree, Singlish guy who spoke like a true salesman with broken accent, few indistinguishable guys who just wanted to leave your table ASAP, then of course the Church guy whose first question you answered made it clear that one of you wasn’t going to any church nor having any future together.
You had your tragironic moments with intellectual guys who thought you were having a good time like they were: snack guy, a local snack distributor who happened to be an educator and the only guy who quoted Soekarno to make his statement about education and liberation and to impress a girl, only turned out to be a total self-centric dude in the room who regaling yourself with his wine only requesting it back after a sip; and the learning program guy who actually very nice but sought after for any business opportunity with you (which you were partly to blame since you came up with the company profile presentation-like approach in the first place after you did not know what else to tell).
After the long ride of short stilted minutes, we had to tick on our score card who we wanted to get to know further and their contacts for the host to quickly match us up while we were “freed” to join the looser session for longer conversation with whom we were interested. Yet we pretty much looked like lost cattle nipping and munching all the delicate snacks (since the last drop of wine drained out by the guys even before the session started), rolling over our eyes, fidgeting our feet trying to get into circular forms of some girls and some boys relating their unavoidable six-degrees of separation linked back to their hosts’ small social networks from which this love-business getting its participants and flimsy trust on their claims that they proposed participants that were credible because they knew them.
The latter so-called benefit could actually be quite a deficit when you realized the hosts’ tight social circles were inclining to almost stereotyping. The gents like the ladies could have been simply your typical high school friends but with better haircut. They came mostly from the same mould of some rich Chinese Christian entrepreneur families, graduated from US or Canada and now either working with big companies, having their own business or helping their parents’ since the local minimum salary rate could neither afford their degrees nor lifestyles. You might not want to complain about that since those actually translate to old firm establishment and all a Cinderella can ask for a safe bet. Still it was challenging to fend off the plausibility of dating one of the children of corn with high maintenance and certain narrow-mindedness and the slim chances of them accepting you and your vague religious stance and class struggle mumbo jumbos.
Yet you had fro-yo guy who interestingly left his corporate job for joining the line of frozen yogurt franchise gold diggers and made it seemed so easy to have jocular conversation with him. He was the only guy who you could free to laugh about and with. He was so familiar (and probably because he was once one of your friend’s best friend at junior high) and an Office geek that it bemused you to see him nonchalantly complaining why every women wanted men to be like Jim when he saw Jim Halpert wallpaper on your BB. You probably hooked him with your adventurous (jurassic) trip to Komodo and you always wanting to be a journalist and cinephile. Just like you, he probably looked for somebody different from the rest. And just like you, he might find himself disappointed in the end.
You met him again on his unexpected invitation out of the blue to his fro-yo booth, only to bewildered than be certain since he seemed busy with his work as food scientist/businessman promoting his baby masterpiece of endless variants of toppings and self-made tutti frutti exotic yogurt recipes and apparently the next hippest place for any reality TV set with one of them having a shooting session at the time. Then he got distant as his friend visited and he caught up twittering about the event. This made you reluctantly referred to this guy in Oprah saying if man likes a woman, he always has a plan laid. What was his plan? You could not decipher. He even cancelled his plan to take you to a movie.
Did he already take the conclusion? How to rejuvenate and perpetuate this? Does it worth a try? Simply to talk with him again, to contradict the unreal and isolate the atom of his real solid self, collect it like a scientist should for further discernment yet appreciate it freely like an artist would. To face the fear and clumsiness like a simple-minded girl could. Alas, the ideal world of independent woman can be so drifted apart from the sorry state you are in. How that promise of a better future with him just intoxicates you into futile day dreaming then early regrets of how you will never meet him again because you just don’t have neither the guts nor active mind of a spell binder and war strategist combined to approach him. Instead of calling him to join for some coffee or movie or saying all those pickup lines that seem so easy and carefree to spill out in the movies; you ended up abandoning your tedious works for a while only for jotting your gut out on paper in some coffee shop.

Saturday, January 22, 2011

Happy Together in Helsinki

A colleague of mine uploaded on her Facebook profile picture of her sipping the famous Acehnese cup of java which she commented as “damn good coffee” in De Helsinki, a small coffee shop in post tsunami torn Aceh taking its name after the capital city of Finland where the historical peace treaty between Indonesian government and Free Aceh Movement (GAM) was held in 2005. It ended almost 30 years of conflict and garnered the mediator Martti Ahtisaari, the former Finnish president a Nobel Prize in 2008. Aside from the snowy country that produces Nokia mobile technology and the free high quality education, those were the only minute scoops that I knew about Finland.

But not until six months ago, I was taking a risk with this benighted mind to have the most random yet best decision in this too orderly life to do my Master’s in Helsinki. The 2010 report of Finland being the second happiest place to live in the world by Gallop survey with 75 percent “thriving” rate just rationalized me to move and live there right away. It ranked first in the Press Freedom Index 2010 and had the best education system with one hundred percent literacy according to Newsweek. It would be very nice to have a cup of coffee in real Helsinki coffee shop and feel very happy, satisfied and articulate, I thought. I was determined to experience it firsthand.

The fixation of what makes Finnish people happy continued as I was settling in by end of the golden summer and watching around Helsinki city center with such naivety assumption that everybody walking in the snow-free streets was content with their welfare state lives or having a peacemaking scheme and IT savvy innovative discussions in warm coffee places and bars sprawling through the avenue. The compact size and intimate architecture of immersed academic sites standing next to the bustling business and historical buildings in the city center, makes it easy for you to walk around the striking Lutheran White Cathedral in the Senate Square after class, café crawling at the Esplanade for networking, shopping fresh local herrings at the Market Square or brushing with latest art scene in Kiasma Modern Art Museum in Mannerheimintie.

I also started to perceive happiness or life satisfaction is propelled by the sustainability and effectiveness of the systems or in other words, how the system actually works and creatively invents itself against the odds. The smooth and safe operation of public transportation along the smart traffic system where you can track and plan your journey online make it easier to be mobile in any kind of beaten weather. It was somewhat foreign concept for me who had been living the utmost daily grill of Jakarta’s malfunction traffic system. Following other leading metropolis cities around the globe, Helsinki is pushing the trending happy lifestyle of community-based innovation whilst keeping true to its strong education system through the emerging social entrepreneurship organizations such as Hub Helsinki that arranges free mobile working facilities and events as one of its social enterprise. Anne Raudaskoski, the managing director of Hub Helsinki stated further in an interview with The 3 inch Canvas, an art community that encourages the similar social model by accessing art through mobile devices, “We primarily want to address issues around society and/or the environment with the aim of improving collective well-being, prosperity and quality of life on different levels.” And Helsinki denizens takes it by heart to carry out the ambitious project to be the World Design Capital in 2012 which places social collaboration and creative industry at the core in improving the quality of life. As travel writer Sally McGrane defined the Finnish high quality design culture in a nutshell, “Beautiful, functional and affordable.”

The word affordable can be quite relative. With very high income of USD 45.7K/capita in 2010 money matters but does not make it to the main barometer of happiness for some people in Finland. Helinä Siivinen, student at University of Helsinki described her meaning of happiness, “It’s not about money. It’s about balance. How you have the balance between family, friends and good education. I think right now we have a very good education.” Like many of the youngsters, she has traveled around the world and still finds Finland her home and best place to stay. Leni Pennanen, a high school extracurricular trainer in Helsinki also confirmed the tendency of settling down in the younger generation, “It’s easier to get a job here and have the money to travel. Yes, we went to see the world but most of the kids these days, they are going back to Helsinki because the city is growing and more alive.” And indeed, it will keep happily doing so.


Sunday, January 16, 2011

The Social Network: The Social Monologues of The Lost and Lonely



I may need to start the sentence with the words of disgust to bring out the volcanic attention raiser or getting inebriated before blogging trash about my true feeling for social media so I can try to be an asshole like most of the characters encircling the social media whiz kid, Mark Z. telling him what he is about or trying to be, because criticism is not a crime, it is a seemed to be justified punishment for the youngest billionaire, punk, and genius of the Facebook founder or any given uber successful personalities as a way to make us feel better about our selves and our addiction towards Facebook without losing our sense of pride and sense of reality in that matter. So enigmatic and eerie is the magnitude of his potential power and ambition to get everyone on the face of the earth connected, you can simply feel the urgency to disconnect from the system and find your grounded rationalization on why you cannot explain the automatic, autistic drive of time-consuming quick finger flicking of refreshing your Facebook page every few minutes expecting for new updates or for the world to change. How you waste Clay Shirky’s “cognitive surplus” of your time and energy to doodling around the page is no different than relent to the temptation to have a sip of that alcohol in your longing bittersweet tongue.

Thus, you enjoy the cathartic ride of watching his life turned into a piece of art in form of motion picture telling the oldest story of human ambition, loneliness, loyalties and yes, Hollywood tradition of high school serenade on the myth of social status and the struggle to be cool. In line with Manohla Dargis’s NYT review, stripped off of its information age setting and tech talk ping pongs, interchanged it with typical teen genre or even a Roman sets; David Fincher can still deliver to you the essence and the thrill of humanistic drama of a nerdy kid trying to be on top of the exclusive social heap of his class and celebrating the ego of being right and getting even with those frenemies reproaching him. On top of that, cold and calculative performance of quiet intensified tide turning to howling storm from the inside by Jesse Eisenberg whose real life choice of keeping his private life out of the celebrity spot light is by not having social network account and being closest to that concept only by playing that dude that invents it; bringing more contrasts to the surface on how he portrays the lurking loneliness and strives for recognition and control of how you want people perceive you as the intangible grand motive.

In a way, that is social network in a nutshell. You try to shape up your real life with the second life in the net (excuse the pun) makes it glossier, grittier, more dramatic as you wish to create it and let people peek into it. It is the communication of monologues of long lost acquaintances and old friends and family members. The social network just brings the conversation up a notch to a messier and more complicated world by building this illusion of us having our own power in controlling the distribution and access towards ours and other people’s privacies and information. A cultural shift of our time that Simon Chesterman points out how we voluntarily and more open in giving up our personal information through the social networks sites that paving the golden ways for government and corporate to tap and reproduce it easily. Aside from the conspiracy theory of the world losing control in a whole different level (but yeah, what’s new, people just love the tinged sense of self-eroded through overconsumption anyway), the movie also instigate the old tale of the man behind the machine caught up in his own device. The ironic paradox of the disturbing last scene where Mark is sitting alone in the battle room after getting rid of his nemesis, clicking monotonously the refresh button of his master craft web page to see if his ex already accepts his invitation as friends parallels back to how life in the net cannot be less cruel and lonesome than the so-called real life. It just makes it more complicated and adds up new social lexicon of the already anxious dating and friendship life to think about.

References

Chesterman, Simon (Nov 12, 2010). “A Little Less Privacy, a Bit More Security”. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/13/opinion/13iht-edchesterman.html. Retrieved Jan 16, 2011.

David, Anna. “The Social Network's' Reluctant Star”. The Daily Beast. http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2010-09-26/the-social-networks-jesse-eisenberg-interviewed/. Retrieved Jan 16, 2011.

Dargis, Manohla (Sep 23, 2010) “The Social Network: Millions of Friends, but Not Very Popular”. The New York Times. http://movies.nytimes.com/2010/09/24/movies/24nyffsocial.html?pagewanted=3. Retrieved Jan 16, 2011.

Shirky, Clay (June, 2010). “How cognitive surplus will change the world”. TED. http://www.ted.com/talks/clay_shirky_how_cognitive_surplus_will_change_the_world.html. Retrieved Jan 16, 2011.